Your matches
How this tool treats you — and the data
Responsible AI isn't a footnote here. It's the design.
No black box
Every match shows its full score breakdown. The ranking logic is open and inspectable — you can see exactly why an organisation appears, and in what order.
Bias, handled deliberately
Published data favours organisations that already have Western funding. So the index spans all levels — international NGOs, Global South-founded organisations, and true grassroots groups — every card is labelled, and a disclosed representation rule guarantees locally-led organisations at least 2 of 6 places when they match your causes. You choose how evidence is weighed, and you can filter to grassroots only.
Governance, judged — not assumed
Concerns about governance are real, and they're why giving has traditionally been routed through international NGOs. This tool takes a different path: every organisation shows its own accountability markers — independent audits by reputable local firms, third-party vetting, published results, who leads and staffs it — rather than inheriting trust or suspicion from where it's based. As the index grows to include state-led programmes, the same proven model applies: donor-organised governance teams, regular independent audit cycles, and strict grant clauses that protect funds — the approach used by the Global Fund and Gavi.
Your privacy
Everything runs in your browser. Your answers are never stored, sent, or sold. Close the tab and they're gone.
Data governance
Profiles are built only from openly published data, cited at the source. The pilot version will move to a standard machine-readable nonprofit data format — so any AI tool, not just this one, can find and represent these organisations fairly.